Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a bit lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although both were released with only 0 months difference. Moto G 5G Plus features a screen that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a bit better pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, they both have a same size screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality pictures and a much more mega pixels camera.
Moto G 5G Plus has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.