Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Moto Z4, having a general score of 92.9 against 79.8. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should provide you very similar OS features. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer device than Moto Z4, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with greater battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs more money than Moto Z4, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.