Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 overall score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a little lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but they have the same thickness.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a higher display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro and Galaxy A71 5G UW have really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.