Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note9's 87.1 overall score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer, just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy Note9. The Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than Galaxy Note9, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.