Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2376px resolution, it also counts with a little better pixel count per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a bit better pictures and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.