Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, having a overall score of 92.9 against 85.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it's a bit thinner and newer. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.