Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than iPhone 8 Plus, getting a score of 91.8 against 87.1. The Galaxy A71 5G is a way newer and just a bit lighter cellphone than iPhone 8 Plus, although it is just a bit thicker. The iPhone 8 Plus has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy A71 5G features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a greater camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.