Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is just a bit better than the iPhone X, getting a general score of 91.8 against 88.1. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G design is much newer than the iPhone X's, although it's just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. The iPhone X features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone X counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G features a superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.