Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than iPhone XR, with a overall score of 91.8 against 82. Galaxy A71 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than iPhone XR. The iPhone XR has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792px, a little lower screen pixel density and a bit smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a greater camera than iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater storage to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 53 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.