Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's overall score of 80. Galaxy A71 5G's construction is newer than the Google Pixel 3's, but it is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Google Pixel 3 features a CPU that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 3 has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels density. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way higher resolution camera.
Although Galaxy A71 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.