Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is better than Google Pixel 3 XL's global score of 80.7. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it is just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy A71 5G and Google Pixel 3 XL have extremely similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 3 XL has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.