Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4 XL, but it is just a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A71 5G shoots greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy A71 5G features greater battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.