Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a older and a bit heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 6a, but Samsung managed to make it a little thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count in each inch in the display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior processor than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 more CPU cores.
Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures or video in low light situations and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Google Pixel 6a and Galaxy A71 5G count with similar batteries duration, although the Google Pixel 6a has just 4410mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.