Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. Galaxy A71 5G's design is extremely newer and thinner, but also heavier than the HTC One M9. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
The HTC One M9 has a better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU.
Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low light environments, a much more mega-pixels camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.