Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than LG G7 Fit. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. LG G7 Fit features a brighter screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture for better low-light images.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.