Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is a bit better than the LG K92's global score of 85.4. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than the LG K92, although they were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG K92. Both of them have a higher pixel number in each display inch, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a display of the same size. The LG K92 has more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better performance than LG K92. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little longer battery life than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also cheap compared to the LG K92, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.