Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than LG Q70, with a 91.8 score against 77.9. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10. The Galaxy A71 5G is a just a bit lighter phone than the LG Q70, but both of them are equally thin.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG Q70, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G takes better videos and photos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than LG Q70, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G is a little more expensive than LG Q70, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.