Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a overall score of 91.8 against 82.5. Even though Galaxy A71 5G is incredibly newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel amount in each inch in the screen. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G takes much better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution back facing camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 5G features better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.