Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is better than LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is extremely newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A71 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures greater pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 5G features superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.