Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 global score. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a newer phone than LG V40 ThinQ, but it's a little heavier and just a little thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos and a camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.