Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's global score of 87.6. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and LG V60 ThinQ were only released 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a bit thinner and lighter. These devices have the same Android 11 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and the LG V60 ThinQ both feature very similar screens, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a bit bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a quite higher pixel number in each inch in the display. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G takes much better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have a same size camera aperture, a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rates. The LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G costs a bit more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.