Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than the LG Velvet, having a global score of 91.8 against 87.1. Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy A71 5G is an a little heavier and a little bit thicker phone than LG Velvet. The LG Velvet features a CPU that's just as good as the Galaxy A71 5G one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and LG Velvet both have very similar displays, although the LG Velvet also has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The Galaxy A71 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
The LG Velvet counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Although Galaxy A71 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Velvet. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Velvet, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.