Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 overall score. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a a bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge (2024), but both are equally thin.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a bit greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge (2024) has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.