Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a global score of 91.8 against 78.5. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Galaxy A71 5G is a much older, a little thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a little higher pixel density.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G features a little longer battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit better camera than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a much lower 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.