Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a 91.8 score against 83.1. Even being the best in this review, we must note that it's also way older, a little thicker and heavier. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. They have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G one, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and a 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way higher video resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G has just a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.