Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is incredibly older than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's body is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both have a same size display, a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.