Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's score of 77. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version. Even being the best in this comparison review, Galaxy A71 5G is a notably older, just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a little better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A71 5G features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.