Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 score. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Galaxy A71 5G's body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G. They have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a screen of the same size and the same pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.