Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a 91.8 score against 81.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Galaxy A71 5G is a a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but both of them have the same thickness.
Galaxy A71 5G has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a bit greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much more MP camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G has a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.