Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a score of 91.8 against 86.3. Galaxy A71 5G's body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but it's a little lighter. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have the same screen density, a screen of the same size and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and a way smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back camera with way more MP.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery lifetime is very similar to the Galaxy A71 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.