Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a global score of 91.8 against 87.1. Galaxy A71 5G's body is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, even though it was released 4 years before. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better display than Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have the same pixel density, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a same size display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera with a way worse 50 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a battery lifetime that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.