Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than Moto G 5G, getting a 91.8 score against 81.5. The Galaxy A71 5G body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Moto G 5G, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G. Both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the same number of pixels per display inch and a screen of the same size. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM. Moto G 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots better photos and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.