Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Power, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide you identical OS features.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Moto G Power has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.