Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Moto G Stylus (2021), getting a global score of 91.8 against 79.3. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus (2021), even though both were released with only a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a little better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs more than Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.