Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having a general score of 91.8 against 76. Galaxy A71 5G's design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), even though it was released 3 years before. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a superior camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a much better 64 MP resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a little better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.