Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, having a overall score of 91.8 against 86.2. Galaxy A71 5G is an older device than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, but it's a little bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Moto G200 5G counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Galaxy A71 5G, although the Moto G200 5G also has a little bit larger display, a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a just a little better pixels amount in each screen inch. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Moto G200 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.