Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G60, with a general score of 91.8 against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is an older device than Motorola Moto G60, but Samsung could make it lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little sharper screen than Moto G60, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G60, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G60 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G60, because although it has a way lower 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.