Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | -- |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Moto G60s, having a 91.8 score against 79.9. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide you identical OS features. The Galaxy A71 5G is a thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Moto G60s. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better display than Moto G60s, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little smaller screen and a just a little lower display density. Galaxy A71 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G60s, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, they both have a back facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Moto G60s has a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G60s also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G60s features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.