Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Moto G71 5G, with a 91.8 score against 82.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is older and just a little heavier than the Moto G71 5G, it's body is still a little thinner. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G71 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Moto G71 5G and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G have quite similar screens, because although the Moto G71 5G has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G has much more storage for games and applications than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes better photographs and videos than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Motorola Moto G71 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.