Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is way better than Moto G8 Power's 76 general score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version. Even when Galaxy A71 5G and the Moto G8 Power were released only 2 months apart, Galaxy A71 5G is a little lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy A71 5G features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto G8 Power, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a little faster processor than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.