Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 score. The Galaxy A71 5G body is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Play, although both were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a more vivid display than Moto G9 Play, because it has a little bigger display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much better video definition and a camera with a way better resolution. Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Moto G9 Play features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.