Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, having a global score of 91.8 against 78.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, even when both were released only 6 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little better performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy A71 5G features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater screen density.
The Galaxy A71 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a same size aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G9 Power counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.