Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a 91.8 score against 75.8. Galaxy A71 5G is a extremely newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more processing cores. Moto Z Force features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G features improved battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G has a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.