Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a 91.8 score against 76.4. Although the Galaxy A71 5G is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels count per display inch. Galaxy A71 5G features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with longer battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.