Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is much newer, but way heavier and a lot thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a processing unit that is very similar to the Galaxy A71 5G one, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent greater battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.