Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Moto Z2 Play, getting a general score of 91.8 against 77.4. Galaxy A71 5G is a much newer cellphone than Moto Z2 Play, but it's noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker. Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.