Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is better than the Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A71 5G's body is newer than Moto Z3's, although it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy A71 5G and Moto Z3 count with quite similar displays, because although the Moto Z3 has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Moto Z3 and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G both feature extremely similar processors, and although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A71 5G features a way better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs more than Motorola Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.