Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the Moto Z3 Play, with a 91.8 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is newer than Moto Z3 Play's, although it is heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G takes way better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.