Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Motorola One Action, having a 91.8 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action's, although it is also just a little heavier. The Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Action counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, both of them have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G has superior battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures way better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.