Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter device than Motorola One Hyper, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS, so they should give identical OS features.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
Motorola One Hyper counts with as much memory for apps and games as Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, both of them have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and exactly the same internal memory capacity. Galaxy A71 5G features a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a little more money than the Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.